Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005281347520.32755-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
By author: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> OTOH, maybe we *did* include too much new features in
> the 2.3 cycle. We may want to try doing a bit less next
> time.
>
I think we did; we have fallen into that pit before. It's very easy
to get seduced by "one more thing"; especially after a previous long
cycle where things have piled up.
However, code freeze after two months is completely unrealistic
IMNSHO. The big thing, and I know a lot of people have asked for
this, is to call a code freeze and sticking to it.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST