> I think we did; we have fallen into that pit before. It's very easy
> to get seduced by "one more thing"; especially after a previous long
> cycle where things have piled up.
So go ahead and write the necessary patches, and by the time the next
stable version is released, the new development will already be half
done. That was my point.
> However, code freeze after two months is completely unrealistic
> IMNSHO. The big thing, and I know a lot of people have asked for
> this, is to call a code freeze and sticking to it.
Yup. I was talking about feature freeze. But both need sticking power.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST