On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 10:19:30PM +0100, James Sutherland wrote:
> On Sun, 28 May 2000, Kenneth C. Arnold wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 09:16:59PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > Coming... yeah right. Identify a few issues that *somebody* *is* *not*
> > > > *already* *working* *on*, and I'll see what I can do...
> > >
> > > Things on my list Im sure nobody is tackling right now:
> > >
> > > 1. Check everyone in maintainers/credits actually still has a working
> > > address.
> >
> > Hmmm... I could do that if everybody could stand a flood of PING-ish mails...
>
> Hrm. I was thinking of something similar, but with a little more
> "optimisation" - I was going to build a script to list all MAINTAINERS
> e-mail addresses, then grep the last month or two of linux-kernel mail to
> see which have been used recently.
Why bother? It'd just be a Reply+Send on their part, occupying no more than
.5 seconds.
But I'd probably wait a few days, checking off using my little script some
of the common people (e.g., Linus, Alan, Tigran, Peter Anvin, etc. to name
very few).
Should it be just maintainers, or all people with credits?
Kenneth
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:20 EST