Jan Niehusmann <list005@gondor.com> wrote:
>So either we need another if(m5229_revision < or > something... ),
>or we need some other way to detect validity of the 80pin detecion bits.
If I understood Andre correctly, there's a validity bit that should be
consulted:
>-------------------------
--- alim15x3.c~ Fri May 26 18:33:11 2000
+++ alim15x3.c Fri May 26 18:41:42 2000
@@ -372,10 +372,9 @@
struct hd_driveid *id = drive->id;
ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive);
byte speed = 0x00;
- byte ultra66 = ((hwif->udma_four) && (id->hw_config & 0x2000)) ? 1 : 0;
+ byte ultra66 = ((hwif->udma_four) &&
+ ((id->hw_config & 0x6000)==0x6000)) ? 1 : 0;
int rval;
if ((id->dma_ultra & 0x0010) && (ultra66) && (ultra33)) {
speed = XFER_UDMA_4;
>-------------------------
Peter
--
_ x ___ p.steiner@t-online.de (Peter Steiner)
/ \_/_\_ /,--' Linux User #55148 (http://counter.li.org/)
\/>'~~~~//
\_____/ perl -e'while(<>){s/=\n//g;s/=([\dA-F]{2})/chr(hex($1))/eg;print;}'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:21 EST