On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:55:30PM +0200, Peter Steiner wrote:
> If I understood Andre correctly, there's a validity bit that should be
> consulted:
See posting by cjtsai@ali.com.tw on linux-kernel - he seems to work at
ALi, so what he wrote is probably true :-)
: The cable detection result is meaningless for chip revision < 0xC2,
: I suggest change the block of code to:
: unsigned int __init ata66_ali15x3 (ide_hwif_t *hwif) {
: ...
: return (hwif->channel) ? cable_80_pin[1] : cable_80_pin[0] ;
: }
I did little more than creating a patch from the above code.
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:21 EST