>Each vendor has to make their own decisions on what they consider stable
>enough to ship. They all reach their own conclusions. The important thing is
>that the patches are published and easily available. All the SuSE VA and
>Red Hat patches appear to be. So you can pick and match from Red Hat
>sponsored enhancements to Raid, lfs, raw I/O etc. SuSE sponsored USB work,
>and of course Xservers, and VA work on stuff like NFS and more.
>
>Stuff from all these sources gradually gets back into the main stream. USB
>for 2.2 is a clear candidate once its more stable in 2.4.0test for example.
Does this mean that Usb backport is candidate for 2.2 merge? It is definitely
more stable than USB in 2.2.15; and (with possible exception of storage) I'd
call it ready for inclusion.
Pavel
ps: sorry for poor formating: this is philips velo 1.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST