Re: A few problems with 2.4.0-test1 [pcmcia/shm?/APM]

From: David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 13:19:52 EST

Next message: Reto Baettig: "Re: searcing for some new scheduling"
Previous message: Ian Soboroff: "Re: Bertrand Meyer challenges some open-source assumptions"
In reply to: Giampaolo Gallo: "A few problems with 2.4.0-test1 [pcmcia/shm?/APM]"
Next in thread: Christoph Rohland: "Re: A few problems with 2.4.0-test1 [pcmcia/shm?/APM]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Giampaolo Gallo wrote:
[snip]

Take a look at http://nifty.blue-labs.org/kernel-probs.html, please tell me
if your machine's reactions are different from what I have listed.

-d

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Reto Baettig: "Re: searcing for some new scheduling"
Previous message: Ian Soboroff: "Re: Bertrand Meyer challenges some open-source assumptions"
In reply to: Giampaolo Gallo: "A few problems with 2.4.0-test1 [pcmcia/shm?/APM]"
Next in thread: Christoph Rohland: "Re: A few problems with 2.4.0-test1 [pcmcia/shm?/APM]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:28 EST