According to Ed Carp:
> Chip Salzenberg (chip@valinux.com) writes:
> > According to Hans Reiser:
> > > Your hypothesis of distribution neutrality by kernel contributors
> > > lacks empirical support.
> >
> > It's not a hypothesis. It's a statement of his personal experience.
> > Either he's lying or he's telling the truth, but he's *not* guessing.
>
> Either you quoted the wrong part, or you're making an unjustified assumption.
> I dn't see anything about guessing in that quote.
Just to clarify my meaning, not to start a new subthread, allow me to
paraphrase the key points of this exchange:
Hans: "Red Hat is blocking ReiserFS, on purpose, through Alan."
Alan: "No they're not. My kernel decisions are not controlled by Red Hat."
Hans: "That's an interesting hypothesis, but you have no evidence."
Chip: "Alan wasn't hypothesizing, he was stating his personal experience.
And come to think of it, where is _your_ evidence?"
Is that a bit clearer?
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <chip@valinux.com>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST