Re: Closing the FILE object.

From: Kent Whitten (kent@vividimage.com)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2000 - 16:57:01 EST

Next message: john.cavan@sympatico.ca: "Re: Some definite problems with test3 and test4"
Previous message: David Schwartz: "RE: fclose() again"
Maybe in reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Closing the FILE object."
Next in thread: Michael Poole: "Re: Closing the FILE object."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I hadn't realized there was a syscall to ask the kernel if dereferencing
a pointer would cause a problem.
If not, glibc would have to go to a great deal of work to get around
this bone-headedness.

kent 8+)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: john.cavan@sympatico.ca: "Re: Some definite problems with test3 and test4"
Previous message: David Schwartz: "RE: fclose() again"
Maybe in reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Closing the FILE object."
Next in thread: Michael Poole: "Re: Closing the FILE object."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST