Re: disk-destroyer.c

From: Stephen Frost (sfrost@ns.snowman.net)
Date: Sat Jul 22 2000 - 02:37:19 EST


On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:

> You can issue commands to the controller but I will not disclose the
> address involved to allow anyone to do that......
>
> Now the controller is the translator of the driver to the drive and
> likewise. It will do what you tell it to do.
>
> > The kernel simply can't be expected to protect hardware from itself. If
> > a piece of hardware can be made to destroy itself, it's bad hardware,
> > not bad kernel programming.
>
> And if you REDLINE YOUR car for an HOUR and the engine blows is that bad
> hardware?? Did I forget that you removed the rev-eliminator??
>
> May caused by an abussive DRIVER......in both case.
>
> The ATA-DRIVER can be used to abuse hardware.

        This is a false analogy. We're not trying to overclock and make
the disk attempt to spin faster. Much closer is the idea that of someone
building a car without a lock. The buyer can't tell the lock isn't there,
but I suspect they'll be having a talk w/ the dealership when the car is
broken in to.

                Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST