david@kalifornia.com (David Ford) writes:
> kiddie. Patches like this should be written and quietly introduced
> into the kernel and a tiny blurb made in the ChangeLog saying "ATA
> protocol violations prohibited". If it can't be fixed, the
> advertising of a bad design flaw is certainly not a good thing.
I'm afraid doing so is not compatible with Andres' attitude (He is,
let's not forget this as he has stated to us twice and even with
attendance lists, A FULL VOTING MEMBER OF THE T-13 GREMIUM [1]. He is
sitting around with the big boys. From Microsoft, Intel, Sun and all
this BIIIG BIIIG $$$-companies. And Andre in their middle. They accept
him as one of theirs! Bow, small people, bow! Bow to Andre as _he_ has
full voting power. Not us.)
This, IMHO is, where the flame war comes from. Not from a technical
issue we basically all agree on. This is not on an exploit. This is on
attitude.
Regards
Henning
[1] Whatever that is.
-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.deAm Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST