Re: disk destroyer, etc

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (dake@staszic.waw.pl)
Date: Sun Jul 23 2000 - 19:51:21 EST

Next message: George Anzinger: "Re: asm in C slightly OT"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: What's wrong with IDE patch and what proper solution should be(Re: disk-destroyer.c)"
In reply to: Taso Hatzi: "disk destroyer, etc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Taso Hatzi wrote:
> Is this a problem for all brands of IDE drive?
> If not, then which brands protect themselves?

What about doing some tests, any volunteers :-)

Or let's write some diagnostic tool:
"
[root@grill.now]# ./d2b
brick-test: /dev/hda Model X FwRev Y: is vulnerable... :-)
brick-test: /dev/hdc Model A FvRev B: is vulnerable... :-)
...
"

[forgive me my stupidity...]

-- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bkz@linux-ide.org>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: George Anzinger: "Re: asm in C slightly OT"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: What's wrong with IDE patch and what proper solution should be(Re: disk-destroyer.c)"
In reply to: Taso Hatzi: "disk destroyer, etc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 23 2000 - 21:00:21 EST