Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:10:32 -0700
From: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@sfgoth.com>
> The requirement makes sense to me, from a
> user standpoint.
It would make the most sense for it to just surplant the thread that
called it, I think. I don't see what the value of having all the
other theads asyncronously disappear is.
How would you implement process id inheritance? I'm pretty sure
that's demanded by POSIX ever since 1998.
And for 1:N thread libraries it is unavoidable.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST