Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on

From: Mitchell Blank Jr (mitch@sfgoth.com)
Date: Sun Aug 27 2000 - 09:28:01 EST

Next message: Michael Zieger: "Broken /proc/meminfo ?"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: BUG/PATCH: include/asm-*/fcntl.h"
In reply to: Mark Kettenis: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mark Kettenis wrote:
> How would you implement process id inheritance? I'm pretty sure
> that's demanded by POSIX ever since 1998.

You'd make an exception for MT proceses.

> And for 1:N thread libraries it is unavoidable.

You'd fork.

But anyway, I guess there's no point in debating what the standard should
have looked like, now is there?

-Mitch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Zieger: "Broken /proc/meminfo ?"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: BUG/PATCH: include/asm-*/fcntl.h"
In reply to: Mark Kettenis: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST