Re: [PATCH 2.4.0-test8] mm/filemap.c

From: David Mansfield (lkml@dm.ultramaster.com)
Date: Thu Sep 14 2000 - 09:40:24 EST


Bill Wendling wrote:
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> Here's a small optimization for the mm/filemap.c file.
>
> - The `head = &mapping->pages;' statement is useless inside the
> repeat, since head isn't modified inside the loop.
> - The `curr = curr->next;' statement doesn't need to be executed
> if the repeat is taken. I changed the while() into a for() loop
> to accomodate this better.
>

I spotted the curr = curr->next thing yesterday, too! I think you're
right on that one. But I'm not sure about the head = &mapping thing.
The reason we jump back here is that we've been outside the spinlock'ed
critical section. Is it possible for the &mapping->pages to change
during this period of time (when spinlock isn't held?), if not, your
patch is ok. If it could change, we need to re-initialize head because
it could have changed while we didn't have the lock locked.

David Mansfield
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST