Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

From: Nathan Paul Simons (npsimons@fsmlabs.com)
Date: Thu Sep 14 2000 - 09:02:13 EST

Next message: John Buswell: "dvma error in 2.4.0-test8 and Sparc2"
Previous message: David Mansfield: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.0-test8] mm/filemap.c"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Another problem is that bitkeeper has not been through a security audit.

Maybe, but i like the fact that BitKeeper uses ssh by default for
transmitting data.

-- 
Nathan Paul Simons, Programmer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: John Buswell: "dvma error in 2.4.0-test8 and Sparc2"
Previous message: David Mansfield: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.0-test8] mm/filemap.c"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST