Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM snapshotting broken?

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@caldera.de)
Date: Thu Oct 26 2000 - 20:28:22 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: kqueue microbenchmark results"
Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: [PATCH] address-space identification for /proc"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM snapshotting broken?"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: LVM snapshotting broken?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:53:08AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Look like a structure mis-match to me, although lv_v2_t is the same for
> all tools.

Sorry I was wrong. The __unused field is missing.
Yet another reason for an official 0.8 maintaince release ;)

Christoph

-- 
Always remember that you are unique.  Just like everyone else.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: kqueue microbenchmark results"
Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: [PATCH] address-space identification for /proc"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM snapshotting broken?"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: LVM snapshotting broken?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST