request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?

• Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] kiobuf/rawio fixes for 2.4.0-test10-pre6"
• Previous message: Kanoj Sarcar: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0-test10-pre6 TLB flush race in establish_pte"
• Next in thread: Marko Kreen: "Re: request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?"
• Reply: Marko Kreen: "Re: request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?"
• Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Could anyone please send me a comment on how actually usable the devfs
support in the 2.4.0 test series is at the moment?
I am currently using 2.4.0-test* as an "ordinary user" and want to try some
of the 2.4 specific new features out, but this is my only system and I don't
want it to be messed up so much, so I'd like to hear some comments first.
Which version of devfsd/utils is needed?
Thanks,
Mirko

-- 
Mirko Klemm
Mirko.Klemm@t-online.de
GPG-Public Key at:
http://www.mutantenzoo.de/kmirko.asc
encrypted messages preferred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] kiobuf/rawio fixes for 2.4.0-test10-pre6"
• Previous message: Kanoj Sarcar: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0-test10-pre6 TLB flush race in establish_pte"
• Next in thread: Marko Kreen: "Re: request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?"
• Reply: Marko Kreen: "Re: request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?"
• Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST