Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10?

• Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: select() bug"
• Previous message: Paul Marquis: "Re: select() bug"
• In reply to: Elizabeth Morris-Baker: "Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10?"
• Next in thread: Elizabeth Morris-Baker: "Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10? [PATCH]"
• Reply: Elizabeth Morris-Baker: "Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10? [PATCH]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

The SCSI spec says that INQUIRY and not
TUR + INQUIRY is the way to go, but maybe we
should make it a compile time option for buggy
drives.

On Thu, Nov 02 2000, Elizabeth Morris-Baker wrote:
> >
>
> You need to send the TUR first, but yes,
> START_STOP will guarantee that you are
> ready to rock and roll.
> The first fix I wrote did a TUR, then
> 3 tries at a START_STOP, till it worked.
>
> cheers,
>
> Elizabeth
>

[deleted]

-- 
Torben Mathiasen <tmm@kernel.dk>
Linux ThunderLAN maintainer 
http://tlan.kernel.dk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: select() bug"
• Previous message: Paul Marquis: "Re: select() bug"
• In reply to: Elizabeth Morris-Baker: "Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10?"
• Next in thread: Elizabeth Morris-Baker: "Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10? [PATCH]"
• Reply: Elizabeth Morris-Baker: "Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10? [PATCH]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST