Followup to: <3A01FC44.8A43FE8B@iname.com>
By author: Paul Marquis <pmarquis@iname.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Okay, I see your point, thanks. A couple of comments/questions:
>
> - Does this make sense with devices with small kernel buffers? From
> my experimentation, pipes on Linux have a 4K buffer and tend to be
> read and written very quickly.
>
> - If I'm correct that pipes have a 4K kernel buffer, then writing 1
> byte shouldn't cause this situation, as the buffer is well more than
> half empty. Is this still a bug?
>
> Semantic issues aside, since Apache does the test I mentionned earlier
> to determine child status and since it could be misled, should this
> feature be turned off?
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
Has anyone considered the possibility of expanding the buffer of
high-traffic pipes?
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST