Re: include conventions /usr/include/linux/sys ?

• Next message: Brian Kress: "/proc/partitions for LVM"
• Previous message: Szabolcs Szakacsits: "Re: [PATCH] Reserved root VM + OOM killer"
• In reply to: LA Walsh: "include conventions /usr/include/linux/sys ?"
• Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: include conventions /usr/include/linux/sys ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <NBBBJGOOMDFADJDGDCPHOEKLCJAA.law@sgi.com> you wrote:
> Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
> a separate kernel include directory. In creating some code, I'm wondering
> what the name of this should/will be. Does it follow that convention
> would point toward a linux/sys directory?

I would vote for

include/linux - exported interfaces
include/kernel - kernel internal interfaces
include/asm - kernel internal/archspecific interfaces

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Brian Kress: "/proc/partitions for LVM"
• Previous message: Szabolcs Szakacsits: "Re: [PATCH] Reserved root VM + OOM killer"
• In reply to: LA Walsh: "include conventions /usr/include/linux/sys ?"
• Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: include conventions /usr/include/linux/sys ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:24 EST