Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:33:29 EST

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "[testcase] madvise->semaphore deadlock 2.4.0"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] hisax/sportster dependency error"
In reply to: Alessandro Suardi: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2."
Next in thread: Silviu Marin-Caea: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing."
Reply: Silviu Marin-Caea: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I know this isn't since I already built 2.4.0-ac2 and -ac3 on this
> laptop and never got any compiler error :)
>
> [asuardi@princess asuardi]$ rpm -q glibc gcc
> glibc-2.2-9
> gcc-2.96-69
>
> random compiler errors => bad hardware. On two machines ? Yes.

My guess is a bad driver. Two machines with random errors from hardware only
in 2.4 is pushing it - possible but pushing it.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "[testcase] madvise->semaphore deadlock 2.4.0"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] hisax/sportster dependency error"
In reply to: Alessandro Suardi: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2."
Next in thread: Silviu Marin-Caea: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing."
Reply: Silviu Marin-Caea: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:20 EST