Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing.

From: Silviu Marin-Caea (silviu@delrom.ro)
Date: Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:20:36 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing."
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:33:29 +0000 (GMT)
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> My guess is a bad driver. Two machines with random errors from hardware
only
> in 2.4 is pushing it - possible but pushing it.

One is bad hardware. The other is bad user. I compiled with DMA support
for SiS 5513 and I have SiS 5571. My appologies for the stupid mistake.

-- 
Systems and Network Administrator - Delta Romania
Phone +4093-267961
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing."
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:22 EST