On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:53:40 +0100 (CET),
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>it sure has an alternative. The 'cpus spinning' code calls touch_nmi()
>within the busy loop, the polling code on the control CPU too. This is
>sure more robust and catches lockup bugs in kdb too ...
Works for me. It even makes kdb simpler.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:12 EST