Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:53:40 +0100 (CET),
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >it sure has an alternative. The 'cpus spinning' code calls touch_nmi()
> >within the busy loop, the polling code on the control CPU too. This is
> >sure more robust and catches lockup bugs in kdb too ...
>
> Works for me. It even makes kdb simpler.
humm...
OK, this seems doable in the case of serial console.
For CONFIG_LP_CONSOLE (which has the same problem) it
looks like we can just call touch_nmi() in lp_console_write().
I'll see what Tim has to say.
-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:12 EST