Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 21:16:24 EST

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: ANNOUNCE New Open Source X server"
Previous message: Scott Prader: "Re: ANNOUNCE New Open Source X server"
In reply to: Grover, Andrew: "RE: Let init know user wants to shutdown"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Grover, Andrew" wrote:
> ACPI has by far the richest set of capabilities. It is a superset of APM.
> Therefore a combined APM/ACPI interface is going to look a lot like an ACPI
> interface.
>
> IMHO an abstracted interface at this point is overengineering. Maybe later
> it will make sense, though.

IMHO We want to be able to support at least three cases: APM, ACPI, and
native PM.

-- 
Jeff Garzik       | "The universe is like a safe to which there is a
Building 1024     |  combination -- but the combination is locked up
MandrakeSoft      |  in the safe."    -- Peter DeVries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: ANNOUNCE New Open Source X server"
Previous message: Scott Prader: "Re: ANNOUNCE New Open Source X server"
In reply to: Grover, Andrew: "RE: Let init know user wants to shutdown"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:29 EST