> I wrote a set of programs to tune the MMX code. Arjan I suspect did similar
> when he reoptimised the code for the newer Athlon. Simple stuff like
Alan - your proggy ran (no output) for about 5 seconds or so, then exited.
Arjan - from yours, I get the results below. Either way, no OOPs, no
errors, etc. (Felt pretty silly as I remounted all my drives and brought
it back up to multi-user mode ;) ..)
So am I correct in assuming at this point that MMX is working fine on this
mobo/chip combo? What's next?
Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $
clear_page() tests
clear_page function 'warm up run' took 16151 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 11893 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 11736 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 10436 cycles per page
clear_page function 'faster_clear_page' took 4998 cycles per page
clear_page function 'even_faster_clear' took 4881 cycles per page
copy_page() tests
copy_page function 'warm up run' took 17595 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 26701 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 26708 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 17649 cycles per page
copy_page function 'faster_copy' took 10480 cycles per page
copy_page function 'even_faster' took 10464 cycles per page
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1 [www.ebb.org/ungeek]
GIT/CC/CM/AT d--(-)@ s+:-- a-->? C++++$ ULBS*++++$ P+>+++ L++++>+++++
E--- W+++ N+@ o+>$ K? w--->+++++ O- M V-- PS+() PE Y+@ PGP++() t 5---
X-- R tv+@ b++++>$ DI++++ D++(+++) G++ e* h(-)* r++ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:39 EST