Re: [PATCH] zero^H^H^H^Hsingle copy pipe

From: Ben LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Date: Mon May 07 2001 - 11:15:23 EST

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH] zero^H^H^H^Hsingle copy pipe"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [Question] Explanation of zero-copy networking"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH] zero^H^H^H^Hsingle copy pipe"
Reply: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH] zero^H^H^H^Hsingle copy pipe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
> I'm now running with the patch for several hours, no problems.
>
> bw_pipe transfer rate has nearly doubled and the number of context
> switches for one bw_pipe run is down from 71500 to 5500.
>
> Please test it.

Any particular reason for not using davem's single copy kiobuf based
code?

-ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH] zero^H^H^H^Hsingle copy pipe"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [Question] Explanation of zero-copy networking"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH] zero^H^H^H^Hsingle copy pipe"
Reply: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH] zero^H^H^H^Hsingle copy pipe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:25 EST