Re: [PATCH] Endian-ness bugs in yellowfin.c

From: Tom Rini (trini@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2001 - 22:02:37 EST

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:55:01PM -0600, Val Henson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:39:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:51:41PM -0600, Val Henson wrote:
> > > - tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFIG_NCR885E
> > > + tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFIG_YELLOWFIN
> >
> > Since you're killing this, why not just remove this question entirely?
>
> This is one of the "design decisions" I referred to. It makes no
> sense to list a 100 Mbit driver under "Ethernet (1000 Mbit)". This is
> my solution. This is the first case of a dual 1000/100 Mbit driver
> and if there's a better way to handle it I'd like to hear it.

Er, sungem does 10/100/1000 too I think.. (It's what's in the new G4
towers..). IMHO, listing it once under the greatest makes sense. But
sungem/gmac are under 10/100 I think. 

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 15 2001 - 21:00:45 EST