On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:02:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:55:01PM -0600, Val Henson wrote:
> >
> > This is one of the "design decisions" I referred to. It makes no
> > sense to list a 100 Mbit driver under "Ethernet (1000 Mbit)". This is
> > my solution. This is the first case of a dual 1000/100 Mbit driver
> > and if there's a better way to handle it I'd like to hear it.
>
> Er, sungem does 10/100/1000 too I think.. (It's what's in the new G4
> towers..). IMHO, listing it once under the greatest makes sense. But
> sungem/gmac are under 10/100 I think.
You misunderstood what I meant. This is the first case of one driver
supporting two different cards, one 10/100 and one 10/100/1000. All
the gigabit cards are 10/100/1000 as far as I know. I still think the
driver should be listed in both the 100 Mbit and 1000 Mbit Ethernet
menu sections, unless someone comes up with a better idea.
-VAL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 15 2001 - 21:00:46 EST