In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote:
>
>
>I just wanted to get some opinions on this for possible inclusion in 2.5.
>Alexey, if you have any comments...
>
>The scenario is as follows:
>
>Suppose I have a fancy routing setup, dynamically configured by different
>binaries, scripts, etc, complete with multiple addresses per link, additional
>routing rules and tables specified using iproute2, etc.
....
>Does this sound like a good idea? How hard would this be to implement (not
>knowing what the current code looks like, I don't know how this would be done)?
Most routing daemons handle your problem just fine. Perhaps you
should look into those daemons first, try 'bird' for instance.
-- Windows 2001: "I'm sorry Dave ... I'm afraid I can't do that."- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:00:35 EST