Re: Scheduler ( was: Just a second ) ...

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Dec 18 2001 - 09:31:32 EST


> I have a feeling that this discussion got sidetracked: cpu cycles burnt
> in the scheduler indeed is non-issue, but big tasks being needlessly moved
> around on SMPs is worth tackling.]

Its not a non issue - 40% of an 8 way box is a lot of lost CPU. Fixing the
CPU bounce around problem also matters a lot - Ingo's speedups seen just by
improving that on the current scheduler show its worth the work

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:16 EST