Alan Cox writes:
> > I'd prefer if tree maintainers (that means you, Alan:-) don't apply
> > devfs patches that didn't come from me. I've already posted a patch
> > which cleans up *all* the remaining printk()'s. In fact, it's a pair
> > of patches, one for 2.4.x and one for 2.5.x. That was yesterday. Today
> > I'm still seeing this thread being beaten to death.
>
> I'll apply stuff to my tree that looks sane and see what happens, if I know
> there is an active maintainer I'll also replace it with newer stuff from
> the mainstream and I won't submit it on to Marcelo.
>
> So no worries, I'm not going to screw your patchsets to Marcelo up
OK.
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:22 EST