Re: kernel: ldt allocation failed

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 16:17:29 EST


Jakub Jelinek wrote:

>>>
>>x86-64, interestingly, retains vestigial meaning of the %fs and %gs
>>registers (but no others) to use as a base pointer for this reason
>>alone.
>
> Well, on x86-64 this is purely x86-64 ABI designers decision, they could
> pick one of %r8 - %r15 and use that as thread pointer instead (and were
> recommended to do so).
>

Wasting an architectural register is still bloody expensive, even if 1
among 16 is less than 1 among 8. They'll be using %gs as thread pointer
in userspace and CPU pointer in kernel space.

        -hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:53 EST