Well, I can't speak for Alan, Andrea or
Red Hat, but their respective kernels
are all likely to be kept pretty well up
to date on the current O(1) - that's
certainly the case AFAICT -
Joe
anton wilson wrote:
>On Friday 19 July 2002 03:54 pm, J Sloan wrote:
>
>
>>Use 2.4-aa, 2.4-ac or 2.4-redhat kernel
>>and you get the O(1) secheduler at
>>no extra cost -
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>Joe
>>
>>
>
>
>I'm actually worried not about just the O(1) scheduler but if these patches
>will be incorporating the O(1) bug fixes such as the serious one in
>balance_load where curr->next was used instead of current->prev. Also, I need
>to use a patch that won't tamper with the usb implementation because I'd have
>to update our current usb driver to fit into the new system, and I'm getting
>flack about wasting time trying to update that thing already . . . So if you
>tell me no, I can go tell my boss I have to update the usb driver.
>
>
>Anton
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:31 EST