On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:07:57AM +0100, Alan Cox escreveu:
> > On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 15:06, Albert Cranford wrote:
> > > Hello Linus,
> > > The i2c & lm_sensors group would like to submit these 9
> > > patches from our stable 2.6.3 package.
> >
> > Does this stuff still destroy thinkpads so badly they have to go back to
> > ibm for a non warranty repair ? Nobody seems willing to provide straight
> > answers, and I think they must be addressed before we merge such code
>
> Is there any other machine that is known to get fubar when using this code?
> Perhaps a THINKPAD_SUPPORT in "Processor Types and Features", like there is
> already for Toshiba and Dell laptops, that would disable the lm_sensors code,
> and besides I think that this code should be marked EXPERIMENTAL, so that
> users would be warned about these problems.
Anything short of "Destroy my precious Thinkpad? [y/N]" probably is
insufficient. Frankly, I don't think even that's enough. Once this is
mainlined, someone will want to build a kitchen sink distro kernel with
sensor support and if the code itself isn't autodetecting whether it's on
a problematic platform, it won't be long before someone boots their
Thinkpad off a friend's CDR and toasts it.
-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST