Re: [PATCH] 'select' failure or signal should not update timeout

From: dank@kegel.com
Date: Fri Jul 19 2002 - 22:59:30 EST


Alan Cox wrote:
> > <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/select.html>
> > says that 'select' may modify its timeout argument only "upon
> > successful completion". However, the Linux kernel sometimes modifies
> > the timeout argument even when 'select' fails or is interrupted.
>
> This is extremely useful behaviour. POSIX is broken here.

I tried to make use of this behavior back in 2.2 days, I think,
and ran into trouble. The time remaining wasn't quite right, I seem
to recall, making this nifty feature less useful. I've since
given up on it.

> Fix it in the C library or somewhere it doesn't harm the clueful

Can you give an example of a clueful package that makes
use of this feature and would be harmed if select() suddenly
became posix-compliant?

- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST