Re: [2.5 patch] tiglusb.c must include version.h

From: Greg KH (greg@kroah.com)
Date: Mon Aug 12 2002 - 12:30:30 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: via vp3 udma corruption"
Previous message: wind@cocodriloo.com: "[wind@cocodriloo.com: Re: GCC still keeps empty loops? (was: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH)]"
In reply to: Julien BLACHE: "Re: [2.5 patch] tiglusb.c must include version.h"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:28:18AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Brad Hards <bhards@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> line 44 is:
> >> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,5,0)
> >>
> >>
> >> The fix is simple:
> > <snip>
> >> +#include <linux/version.h>
> >
> > Wouldn't it be cleaner to just remove this case? It is in 2.5, after all.

I agree.

> But if this should become a hassle for anybody, I'll remove this case
> ASAP.

Don't worry about it, I just made the change in my tree, and will send
the change to Linus later today.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: via vp3 udma corruption"
Previous message: wind@cocodriloo.com: "[wind@cocodriloo.com: Re: GCC still keeps empty loops? (was: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH)]"
In reply to: Julien BLACHE: "Re: [2.5 patch] tiglusb.c must include version.h"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST