On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 14:24, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Robert Love wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > - we have a debug check in preempt_schedule that, even
> > on detecting a schedule with irqs disabled, still goes
> > ahead and reschedules. We should return. (me)
> >
>
> OK, but that warning will still come out of the mess in mm/slab.c.
Yah I saw your previous post. There is also a report or two re oops on
poisoned memory with SLAB_DEBUG and preempt enabled - which should be
fixed by the above return but one report says it does not.
Anyhow, your new methods are fine... if they work, they work.
I am starting to get concerned over the number of routines we are having
to define. It is getting complicated (i.e. the
inc_preempt_non_preempt() stuff).
Maybe keep these local to mm/slab.c ?
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:27 EST