Re: (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct"

From: Xavier Bestel (xavier.bestel@free.fr)
Date: Tue Sep 03 2002 - 17:52:58 EST


Le mer 04/09/2002 à 00:42, Peter T. Breuer a écrit :

> Let's maintain a single bit in the superblock that says whether any
> directory structure or whatever else we're worried about has been
> altered (ecch, well, it has to be a timestamp, never mind ..). Before
> every read we check this "bit" ondisk. If it's not set, we happily dive
> for our data where we expect to find it. Otherwise we go through the
> rigmarole you describe.

Won't work. You would need an atomic read-and-write operation for that
(read previous timestamp and write a special timestamp meaning
"currently writing this block"), and you don't have that.

        Xav

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:19 EST