Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules
From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 17:43:00 EST
- Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Previous message: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.47-C0"
- In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 22:03, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
>
> So it is business as usual, all sabre noise but none drawn.
> Everyone is scared of the lawyers and all it would do is feed the sharks
> and nobody makes any money but them.
>
> So it is a draw ?
A pointless war has two losers.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Previous message: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.47-C0"
- In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:34 EST