Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 17:36:21 EST

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: e1000 fixes (NAPI)"
Previous message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: Semaphore and Shared memory questions..."
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Next in thread: Eli Carter: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Reply: Eli Carter: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:43:00PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> A pointless war has two losers.
>
> Alan

I like:

"When you're arguing with an idiot, two idiots are arguing"

Told to me by Victor Yodaiken (who suggested I tattoo it on the tops
of my hands and look down a lot while I'm flaming. Good idea, that.)

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: e1000 fixes (NAPI)"
Previous message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: Semaphore and Shared memory questions..."
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Next in thread: Eli Carter: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Reply: Eli Carter: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:34 EST