On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Really? I know he controls what goes in the mainline, but I thought you
> > put in what you found useful in your kernel. Certainly rmap was there
> > until it was old enough to vote.
> >
> > Clearly lm_sensors do have value in a production environment.
>
> 2.4-ac is a bit different. 2.5-ac is stuff Im holding to get a working
> 2.5 to test with. Im trying to avoid getting anything in it Linus wont
> have taken by 2.6.0
Okay, thanks. I was hoping since lm_sensors were proposed before the
freeze, relatively stable, and highly useful that they might get in.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST