Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 14:12:39 EST

Next message: Kurt Johnson: "small doubt about fair-scheduler patch"
Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: LM sensors into kernel?"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 13:50, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> The kernel images in Debian don't have the O(1) scheduler.

At least we should be happy they have a 2.4 kernel available ;-)

*ducks*

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kurt Johnson: "small doubt about fair-scheduler patch"
Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: LM sensors into kernel?"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST