Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 13:50:31 EST

Next message: Ronald Bultje: "Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Got DC10plus working with 2.4.20rc4"
Previous message: Al. Andreou: "(no subject)"
In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:50:50AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

> There was talk of merging the O(1) scheduler into 2.4 at OLS.
> If every distro has it, and 2.5 has it, and it's been around for
>...

The kernel images in Debian don't have the O(1) scheduler.

> Thanks,
>
> M.

cu
Adrian

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ronald Bultje: "Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Got DC10plus working with 2.4.20rc4"
Previous message: Al. Andreou: "(no subject)"
In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:13 EST