Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 12:50:50 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Previous message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "[PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> now that all commercial vendors ship a backport of Ingo's O(1)
> scheduler external projects like XFS have to track those projects
> in addition to the mainline kernel.

There was talk of merging the O(1) scheduler into 2.4 at OLS.
If every distro has it, and 2.5 has it, and it's been around for
this long, I think that proves it stable.

Marcelo, what are the chances of getting this merged into mainline
in the 2.4.20 timeframe?

Thanks,

M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Previous message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "[PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:13 EST