Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@sgi.com)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 20:11:01 EST

Next message: Andrey R. Urazov: "Re: a bug in autofs"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:50:50AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> There was talk of merging the O(1) scheduler into 2.4 at OLS.
> If every distro has it, and 2.5 has it, and it's been around for
> this long, I think that proves it stable.
>
> Marcelo, what are the chances of getting this merged into mainline
> in the 2.4.20 timeframe?

Ingo vetoed it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrey R. Urazov: "Re: a bug in autofs"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:13 EST