Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 17:47:28 EST

Next message: James Simmons: "Re: [STATUS] fbdev api."
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] deprecate use of bdflush()"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 01:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:50:50AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > There was talk of merging the O(1) scheduler into 2.4 at OLS.
> > If every distro has it, and 2.5 has it, and it's been around for
> > this long, I think that proves it stable.
> >
> > Marcelo, what are the chances of getting this merged into mainline
> > in the 2.4.20 timeframe?
>
> Ingo vetoed it.

I wasnt aware Ingo had a veto

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James Simmons: "Re: [STATUS] fbdev api."
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] deprecate use of bdflush()"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST