Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Wed Dec 04 2002 - 06:57:43 EST

Next message: Shahid: "testing mouse device driver"
Previous message: Dr. David Alan Gilbert: "Re: lkml, bugme.osdl.org?"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> Below is the generic part of the start of the compatibility syscall layer.
> I think I have made it generic enough that each architecture can define
> what compatibility means.
>
> To use this,an architecture must create asm/compat.h and provide typedefs
> for (currently) compat_time_t, compat_suseconds_t, struct compat_timespec.
                                        ~~~~
                                        Maybe we need better name?
                                This is too easy to missparse ;-).
                                                                        Pavel

-- 
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Shahid: "testing mouse device driver"
Previous message: Dr. David Alan Gilbert: "Re: lkml, bugme.osdl.org?"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:18 EST