Re: 2.5.67-mm4 & IRQ balancing

From: Bill Davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 16:32:44 EST


On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
> > I like the idea of being able to tune the int processing with a user
> > program. I don't think I share your vision of making a user program part
>
> You've actually been able to do this with echo(1) for a while, just not
> 'automagically'
>
> > of the kernel to allow diddling an interface which might be better getting
> > right the first time, and protecting against "features" being added.
> > Hopefully it will be minimalist, and may well benefit from a totally
> > different user program for various machine types.
>
> The smp interrupt affinity interface hasn't changed for a while (since
> inception?), we're only now deciding on where to put the autotune aspect
> of it.

So the usermode program would not have to be part of kernel source as
previously stated, if I read that right, it just has to conform to a
standard. And everybody can write one and try to measure the difference it
makes.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:18 EST